3 Jaw –Dropping Fitness and Health Facts You Probably Know Nothing About

Asian guy in shock

Shocking Health and Fitness facts image by Stuart Miles

65% of Cancers are Simply Due to Bad Luck

According to the American cancer Society:

“Cancer starts when cells in a part of the body start to grow out of control. Cancer cell growth is different from normal cell growth. Instead of dying, cancer cells continue to grow and form new, abnormal cells. Cancer cells can also invade (grow into) other tissues, something that normal cells can’t do. Growing out of control and invading other tissues are what makes a cell a cancer cell.”

Researchers have recently proven that plain old “biological” bad luck is a major contributor to getting cancer. Two-thirds of cancer victims of various types had neither risky habits such as smoking and drinking nor was heredity to blame. The researchers found that random mutations in the genes were the cause of up to 65% of cancers out there.

Out of thirty-one cancer types researched, twenty-two were found to be largely explained by these random mutations. The twenty-two cancer types included leukaemia and pancreatic, bone, testicular, ovarian and brain cancer.

Dr. Bert Vogelstein of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore compares it to losing the lottery:

“When someone gets cancer, immediately people want to know why,” “They like to believe there’s a reason. And the real reason in many cases is not because you didn’t behave well or were exposed to some bad environmental influence, it’s just because that person was unlucky. It’s losing the lottery.”

You Exhale the Fat You Burn

Many of us are obsessed with diets and fitness trends. Whether we are trying to lose weight or get stronger, it always includes losing that extra unwanted fat.

Have you ever asked yourself where all that extra fat goes? Many health professionals cannot answer this question correctly. The most common misconception among doctors, dieticians and personal trainers is that the fat that we lose gets converted into energy or heat.

According to a new study conducted by the University of New South Wales, when you lose weight, the mass of burnt fat is breathed out as carbon dioxide and goes into the air.


“Ruben’s novel approach to the biochemistry of weight loss was to trace every atom in the fat being lost and, as far as I am aware, his results are completely new to the field,” says Professor Brown.

Professor Andrew Brown, head of the UNSW School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences explains:

“There is surprising ignorance and confusion about the metabolic process of weight loss.”

The study shows that in order to lose ten kilograms of fat you will need to inhale twenty-nine kilograms of oxygen. This will cause the metabolic process to produce twenty-eight kilograms of carbon dioxide and eleven kilograms of water.

Ruben Meerman, a physicist and science TV presenter explains:

“With a worldwide obesity crisis occurring, we should all know the answer to the simple question of where the fat goes. The fact that almost nobody could answer it took me by surprise, but it was only when I showed Andrew my calculations that we both realised how poorly this topic is being taught.”

Professor Andrew Brown and Ruben Meerman are hoping that their findings will be included in secondary school curricula and university biochemistry courses in order to correct the misconceptions about weight-loss.

You Can Think Your Way to Strength

The American Physiological Society (APS) recently published a study that shades light on the power of regular mental imagery exercise. During four weeks of immobilization, regular mental imagery exercises helped test subjects preserve some of their strength.

The study explains that strength is controlled by a number of factors. The most studied of these factors is the skeletal muscle. The role of the nervous system when it comes to its contribution towards strength is not yet fully understood. This research studied the role of the brain’s cortex in strength development.

The researchers designed an experiment to measure changes in wrist flexor strength in three groups of normal individuals.

Twenty-nine healthy adults wore rigid casts that extended from just below the elbow past the fingers, immobilizing the hand and wrist, for four weeks. Fifteen individuals who did not wear casts served as the control group.

Half of the subjects with wrist-hand immobilization casts were told to perform regular imagery exercises. They were asked to imagine that they were intensely contracting their wrist for five seconds and then resting for five seconds. There were thirteen rounds per session and each round included four reps. The other half of the group with the wrist-hand immobilization casts were not instructed to do any imagery exercises.

At the end of the four weeks the results were as follows:

  1. Everyone who wore a cast had lost strength in comparison to those who didn’t.
  2. The group that performed mental imagery exercises preserved 50% more strength than the group that didn’t.
  3. It took lesser time for the nervous system to fully activate the muscles for the subjects in the group that performed imagery exercises compared to the group that didn’t.

The study which was published in the Journal of Neurophysiology concludes:

“These findings suggest neurological mechanisms, most likely at the cortical level, contribute significantly to disuse-induced weakness, and that regular activation of the cortical regions via imagery attenuates weakness and VA by maintaining normal levels of inhibition,” the research team wrote. “Thus our findings that imagery attenuated the loss of muscle strength provide proof-of-concept for it as a therapeutic intervention for muscle weakness and voluntary neural activation.”

For the complete research literature you can check out the sources I have listed below.

Which of the three did you find most intriguing? Please share with us in the comment box below.









27 thoughts on “3 Jaw –Dropping Fitness and Health Facts You Probably Know Nothing About

  1. Thanks for the article… as a mommy of child who got leukemia at 3 years old, I was immediately told it was random. I believed it for so long until I met so many parents and grandparents who all had similar stories as my son.
    After my son received his meningitis vaccine he got meningitis, after he received his next big round of vaccines… it was downhill from there then Cancer.
    We met tons and tons of kids with the same story and some that even went blind and paralyzed. We recently had all of our DNA tested, it turns out he has about 9 DNA polymorphisms that are high cancer markers. He has a poor ability to detox toxins. (MTHFR and many other mutations). I think the randomness is in the genes he acquired from his dad and myself but not in the Cancer.
    I believe with all my heart that had he not been given all those toxins at tge same time as a baby, then he would not have gotten Cancer. After his first vaccination up until he got his last vaccine he was the sickest kid one would ever meet, constant earaches, allergies, flus, strep throat, meningitis with both vaccines… since we stopped giving him vaccines at 4, he has never had the flu, never one earache or infection… and never any major illnesses.
    If a child does not have the DNA mutations my family has then maybe their body can handle vaccines and other antibiotics…
    I’m not against vaccines… but I am for a protocol to help determine if a child is at a high risk for having a major adverse reaction to vaccines.
    Each of us is unique… we need to have a protocol that determines whether a child’s family history is conducive for vaccinations and other pharmaceuticals…
    Just my opinion, thanks for sharing your thoughts and findings… they are helpful!

    • Hi Dr. Dee your story is eye-opening. I am glad you commented. I hope thngs are better now with your child’s health and I absolutely agree with you about the protocol that determines whether a child’s family history is conducive for vaccinations and other pharmaceuticals.

  2. Pingback: 3 Jaw –Dropping Fitness and Health Facts You Probably Know Nothing About | Health Talk
  3. Interesting article. I still feel that cancer in the body is more down to lifestyle factors then just mere luck of the draw but however many sides of an argument helps with a greater picture.

    • Random mutation and cancer have a chicken-and-egg kind of relationship. This is because one should wonder why cancer cases only 40 years ago compared to today were negligible in number. Why is it that when we are able to eradicate some serious diseases, cancer numbers are sky-rocketing. Yes the random mutation is a big contributor but why wasn’t it before; could it be because of the lifestyles we have and the quality of food we consume? This is just me and my super-mega intelligence thinking out loud 🙂

      Thanks for the great comment and the reblog.

      • Recently I have been more and more cautious of acidic ph factors created in our bodies by the foods we consume. Also the way our foods are processed and the effects our diets place on our evolution as species. So quality of food should be questioned and carefully considered but with growing consumerism and convenience we as society seek this is becoming lost. It is easy for studies to suggest luck as a large factor as it takes away our freedom of choice that bring about positive or negative consequences. Thank you for your openness to discuss..

  4. All three caught my attention, but the most intriguing one was thinking your way to strength. ..for reasons that are too complicated to go into in a comment box.

  5. I’m sorry, but the increased stats on cancer (either #1 or #2 killer) contradicts the ‘luck’ way of looking at it.  The body’s response to carcinogens and the build-up of acids/ions are the real causes.  On a general scale, it can be hard to single anything out, but luck is no real explanation at all.

    • Yes I understand your frustration on the subject. This is but one of many researches out there. It is quite recent and the findings – as with all research- may be disputed in the future by another research.I’ve said this a few times and I’ll say it again,it is vital that we do not believe everything we read blindly. If a subject is important to us we need to take the pains to get as close to the truth as possible. Who knows who funds these researches these days. However as an important piece of the puzzle it is paramount to share it. That is what we do here so that you can make your own choices. Thanks for the comment.

Comment Here - We really value your input.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s